(no subject)
Apr. 1st, 2004 09:48 amFrom
supergee, as he observed, "a fascist who appeals to left and right alike"
I'm not sure I agree with the rest of the writer's observations on modern American "conservatives" precisely, but it does explain why I tend to find politics so ennervating to watch, much less get involved in.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
In The Concept of the Political, Schmitt wrote that every realm of human endeavor is structured by an irreducible duality. Morality is concerned with good and evil, aesthetics with the beautiful and ugly, and economics with the profitable and unprofitable. In politics, the core distinction is between friend and enemy. That is what makes politics different from everything else. Jesus's call to love your enemy is perfectly appropriate for religion, but it is incompatible with the life-or-death stakes politics always involves. Moral philosophers are preoccupied with justice, but politics has nothing to do with making the world fairer. Economic exchange requires only competition; it does not demand annihilation. Not so politics.
"The political is the most intense and extreme antagonism," Schmitt wrote. War is the most violent form that politics takes, but, even short of war, politics still requires that you treat your opposition as antagonistic to everything in which you believe. It's not personal; you don't have to hate your enemy. But you do have to be prepared to vanquish him if necessary. (emphasis added)
I'm not sure I agree with the rest of the writer's observations on modern American "conservatives" precisely, but it does explain why I tend to find politics so ennervating to watch, much less get involved in.